The Second Annual Conference on the Convergence of Science and Spirituality: "Beyond Einstein's Determinism: How Interdisciplinary and Interfaith Cooperation are Inspiring New Perspectives on Consciousness"
September 29, 2007 | 09:00 AM
It will be held at the Iliff School of Theology in Denver, CO
Here is the announcement about the conference.
Here below is some information from the conference program:
Abstract: The relationship between science and spirituality is an ancient one: it is only in modern times that science divorced from spirituality, though it is true that in the West with Augustine's notion of the corruption of nature a dominant stream of Christianity felt science was irrelevant. But not so in the creation spirituality tradition including Hildegard of Bingen ("all science comes from God") and Thomas Aquinas ("a mistake about creation results in a mistake about God.")
We will explore the four Paths of creation spirituality in light of today's many gifts from science, for example, the Via Positiva (science provides many reasons for arousal of awe); the Via Negativa (science substantiates what meditators East and West have been doing for centuries and chaos theory mirrors the Dark Night of the Soul experience of the mystics); the Via Creativa (creativity becomes the identifying characteristic of human beings and our nearest ancestors); the Via Transformativa (applied science helps solve real issues of global warming, the universality of homosexuality, and more).
Abstract: Einstein’s objection to the indeterminism in quantum mechanics is well known. However, Einstein’s most influential challenge to quantum theory revolved around his rejection of the lack of independent existence in quantum objects. For example, Einstein’s biographer, the physicist Abraham Pais, wrote, “We often discussed his notions on objective reality. I recall that during one walk Einstein suddenly stopped, turned to me, and asked whether I really believed that the moon exists only when I look at it.” Einstein’s rejection of a central feature of quantum mechanics (quantum object’s lack of independent existence) ignited a debate about the philosophic foundation of nature that lasted for a half century. It culminated in what many people consider the most important finding since the advent of modern science: the famous experiments that conclusively revealed nonlocality in nature. Now we know that “quantum moons” demonstrably do not exist when unobserved. Assuming no technical background in physics, this lecture shows how such “experimental metaphysics” has an extraordinarily detailed resonance with the Middle Way Buddhist principle of emptiness, the very heart of Buddhism. What Einstein found to be the most vexing feature of quantum mechanics is, in the eyes of Middle Way Buddhists, the ultimate nature of reality and the foundation for universal compassion. In this way, physics sheds light on the nature of reality, including consciousness, and has moral implications for how we treat each other and the planet.
 Abraham Pais, “Subtle is the Lord”: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein (Oxford University Press,
Abstract: In almost all people, religious conviction and religious adherence derive from conflating knowledge with interpretive speculation. These two natural and positive faculties cannot inhere fully. Thus the foundation for virtually all religious life in individuals and in the world has a fracture at its foundation (a fracture with the potential to yield both positive and negative responses and outcomes). This tear in the basis of religious life informs and participates in all subsequent religiosity and religious expression, often infecting religious life with a particularly virulent strain of the disease of separation. The tiny few whose religious life is all knowledge and no speculation found religions, or are the saints of their various traditions. War, conflict, disease, exploitation, ecological dereliction, and other forms of disorder and horror are due to an insufficient number of saints at any given time (but this is a difficult problem to solve). This paper introduces interim and intermediary (also more widely available) steps we can take to realize humane ends on a global scale, while striving to increase the saint population.
11:10 - 11:40 am
Dr. David Trickett:
Bio: David Trickett recently joined the Iliff community as its 13th president and as Henry White Warren Professor of Ethics and Leadership. He was previously chairperson of the board and senior fellow at the Center for World Religions, Diplomacy, and Conflict Resolution (CRDC) at the Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution at
As an ordained United Methodist elder in full connection within The United Methodist Church (UMC), President Trickett has worked in congregations from 350-10,000 members. His service to the UMC includes membership on numerous committees at district, annual conference, and jurisdictional levels; participation in the Oxford Institute of Methodist Theological Studies; election to the World Methodist Council; and service on the denominational Genetic Science Task Force. As an interfaith leader involved in global dialogue, he has worked to bring many different faith traditions together on complex issues.
President Trickett has taught at several theological schools, including Perkins School of Theology, Washington Theological Consortium (which he also headed), Virginia Theological Seminary, Howard University School of Divinity, and the Catholic University of America.
Abstract: Ontological arguments are philosophical discourses that purport to deductively prove the existence of God. The first recorded argument in Western thought is due to St. Anselm, which mathematicians Descartes and Leibniz later refined. This argument reached the pinnacle of abstraction in the realm of symbolic logic in the twentieth century thanks to Gödel. Nevertheless, the argument has met with fierce critics and opponents. In this article I will briefly review the history of the ontological arguments and discuss two major hurdles in the traditional approach to the subject. The first obstacle is a result of the consequences related to the definitions of God used by the proponents of the ontological arguments. The second obstacle lies in addressing the existence of God without first addressing the existence of the soul. I will build on Gödel’s ontological argument – whose theology is essentially Judeo-Christian – and combine it with the philosophical framework of the Vaishnava school of thought based on the Bhagavad Gita and the Vedanta Sutra. I will present my rationale and plans for advancing an ontological argument that first considers the existence of the soul, and once that is established, proceeds to conclusively address the existence of God.
Abstract: This paper is based on the scientific exploration of the nature of Reality, which includes both Quantum Reality (which is the foundation of physical universes) and the realm of pure ideas. This exploration is done through a scientific theory (denoted by TK) propounded by the author, which (so far as the author is aware) is the only theory put forward so far by any philosopher or scientist which spans the entire realm of Reality, both physical and otherwise.
This paper deals mainly with the implications of TK in the Spiritual realm, which is defined to be that part of Reality wherein the destiny of man is embedded. Indeed, for humans, Spirituality is that behavior and frame of mind which would be required of a person if he is to act rationally in the face of Reality (i.e., in the face of facts as they really exist). (Here, by a 'rational action', we mean an action that is not foolish, inefficient, misguided, or naive. A rational person would ignore Spirituality only because of ignorance of pertinent facts that are not easily visible to the mind's eye.)
This explanation and the associated discussion shall lead us into the general spiritual implications of TK, that throw light on Religion and its occasional conflict with Science.
Bio: Professor Srivastava received his Ph.D. degree in 1961. In 1966, he became full Professor at
In 1998, on his 65th birthday, two large felicitation volumes (containing articles from top experts from all over the world) were published. In 1975, he founded the prestigious monthly Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, of which he has been the Editor-in-Chief. He has been the President of several world organizations. He has made many important discoveries, several of which bear his name. He has written more than 140 papers, and (co-) authored or edited several books. Since the sixties, he has also been interested in Philosophy, Consciousness, Quantum Physics, and Spirituality, in which he has lectured internationally and written extensively.
Abstract: Long ago Western science discarded the concept of a vital force. However, this concept is central to virtually all indigenous medicine and perennial wisdom throughout the world. It has often been considered to be the very quintessence of life. Today a similar concept similar is emerging at the frontiers of science, known as the biological field or “biofield”.
The biofield is an invisible energy field of each organism that is proposed to be the super-regulator of all the biochemistry and physiology of the body, holding the key to the invisible higher order of being. Linking the metaphysical realm of invisible fields to the physical body, the biofield may be the closest that science can ever approach the soul.
Laboratory measurements show that each person has a unique energy signature that is influenced by states of consciousness. The human biofield extends from the body into the surrounding space and is thought to “entangle” each person with one another, the biosphere, and even the cosmos.
The biofield is central to understanding life’s integral wholeness and to the development of an integrative medicine that incorporates indigenous healing methods. It is thought to be the scientific basis of many types of therapies, including laying-on-of-hands by spiritual healers, energy psychology, and homeopathy. This talk will summarize the biofield concept and its practical consequences for spirituality and the environment.
Abstract: If we succeed in understanding consciousness scientifically, we could never explain away the mystery of subjectivity or its creative abilities. But we might be able to characterize how everyday complexity (dramatized by living systems and the entire cosmos), quantum perplexity (famously including uncertainty, the probabilistic “reality” of wavefunctions, and nonlocal entanglement), and the capacity for conscious experience are interrelated. If it turns out that only complex systems that are coupled with the quantum world in which they are immersed (like fish at sea) in a certain way can become conscious and can express and inform conscious experience, this discovery would have tremendous implications for our spiritual perspectives. Reciprocally, our spiritual appreciation of the context of the sacred could motivate the direction of consciousness studies research, as, for example, in the study of the relationships among the entire cosmos, the quantum vacuum, and the Supreme Consciousness or God. This talk will explore the potential for a worldview that integrates scientific and spiritual perspectives in the quest to comprehend the roots of conscious experience.
PANEL / DISCUSSION/ Q & A
The Integration of Science and Spirituality:
Panel Members: Drs. Matt Fox,